Vishal Bhand Ph.D.
The rapid advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AI) has transformed the landscape of design, from generative visuals and predictive trend analysis to automated prototyping and mass customization. As algorithms become increasingly capable of simulating creativity, an inevitable question arises: What happens to human-led design, craft practices, and traditional knowledge systems in the age of AI? Rather than signalling an end, the rise of AI marks a critical moment of reflection especially for regions like India, Southeast Asia, Japan, and Africa, where living craft traditions continue to shape culture, economy, and identity.
AI and Design: A Tool, Not a Replacement
AI excels at speed, efficiency, and pattern recognition. It can generate thousands of design iterations, optimize supply chains, and forecast consumer preferences with remarkable accuracy. However, leading technology companies themselves acknowledge its limitations. Microsoft has emphasized that AI cannot replace hands-on experience, tacit knowledge, or the emotional depth embedded in human-made objects.
Craft practices whether handloom weaving, pottery, batik, metalwork, or wood carving are not merely production systems. They are embodied knowledge, developed through years of physical engagement with material, rhythm, error, and intuition. The sensorial understanding of texture, resistance, and balance cannot be coded into an algorithm. Nor can AI replicate the emotional bond humans form with handcrafted objects that carry stories, labour, and memory.
Craft, Aesthetics, and Contemporary Design
In contemporary design discourse, aesthetics is increasingly defined by authenticity, material honesty, and imperfection qualities intrinsic to handmade objects. Traditional Indian techniques such as ikat, jamdani, ajrakh, kalamkari, batik, natural dyeing, and hand embroidery provide rich design vocabularies shaped by ecology, ritual, and regional identity.
While AI can assist designers in pattern visualization, archival documentation, or colour simulation, the aesthetic intelligence of craft emerges from lived cultural contexts. Each motif and surface articulation embodies social meaning that extends beyond visual appearance, reinforcing craft’s relevance within contemporary design practice.
Sustainability Beyond the Environment
In the Indian and Global South context, sustainability encompasses not only environmental responsibility but also social and economic resilience. Craft-based production systems are inherently low-energy, rely on renewable or biodegradable materials, and support circular economies. More importantly, they generate employment for millions in rural and semi-urban areas, particularly women and marginalized communities.
At a time when automation threatens large-scale job displacement, crafts offer skill-based livelihood opportunities that cannot be outsourced or mechanized. Handmade production sustains local economies, strengthens community networks, and provides meaningful employment for youth in developing nations.
Living Craft Cultures in a Global Context
Today, regions such as South and Southeast Asia, the Indian subcontinent, Japan, and parts of Africa remain among the few areas where living craft traditions continue as part of everyday life. These regions hold critical knowledge for global discussions on sustainability, slow production, and ethical consumption.
Rather than viewing craft as obsolete, contemporary designers and scholars increasingly recognize it as a future-oriented practice one that integrates culture, economy, and ecology. In this framework, AI functions as an enabling tool rather than a creative substitute.
Education, Skill, and the Limits of AI
India’s National Education Policy (NEP) 2020 underscores the importance of skill-based education, experiential learning, and the integration of art and craft into mainstream curricula. This policy shift acknowledges that learning through making develops cognitive, emotional, and social capacities that extend beyond theoretical knowledge.
Craft education nurtures patience, empathy, problem-solving, and material intelligence qualities essential for future designers navigating AI-driven environments. Thus, while AI may transform design tools, it cannot replace the pedagogical and cultural value of craft-based learning.
Conclusion: Craft in the Age of AI
AI is undeniably reshaping the design profession, offering unprecedented speed and analytical capability. Yet, its rise also clarifies the irreplaceable value of human creativity, tactile intelligence, and emotional connection. Craft practices rooted in hand, heart, and heritage occupy a space beyond algorithmic logic.
In the era of AI, handmade products will command greater cultural and economic value precisely because they represent authenticity, sustainability, and human presence. The intersection of AI and design, therefore, does not threaten craft; it reinforces its relevance. As technology advances, it is the human touch that will continue to define meaning, identity, and enduring design.
References
Bhand, V. C. (2012). Design education in India to enliven traditional art and craft. University News, 50(45), 93–95.
Government of India. (2020). National Education Policy 2020. Ministry of Education, New Delhi. McCullough, M. (1996). Abstracting Craft: The Practiced Digital Hand. MIT Press.
Microsoft. (2023). Responsible AI and human-centered design. Microsoft Design & Research Insights.
Papanek, V. (1995). The Green Imperative: Natural Design for the Real World. Thames & Hudson.
Sennett, R. (2008). The Craftsman. Yale University Press.
UNESCO. (2017). Intangible Cultural Heritage and Sustainable Development. UNESCO Publishing.
World Economic Forum. (2020). The Future of Jobs Report. Geneva.
Dr. Vishal C. Bhand is Head and Associate Professor in Design at Silpa Sadana, School of Craft and Design at Visva Bharati University, Santiniketan and National Consultant for NEP 2020 GOI.
Contributor